Periodic by Default: How Medium-Sized Letting Agents Should Rebuild Their Tenancy Process for the New Normal

#

The Renters’ Rights Act changes the rhythm of agency life. From 1 May 2026, assured shorthold tenancies are being replaced by periodic tenancies as the default model, and Section 21 is being abolished. That means the old operational cadence; market, sign, file away, renew, repeat, no longer works in quite the same way.

For medium-sized letting agencies, this is not just a legal change. It is a workflow change. And that is where the real pain sits.

For years, many agencies have built internal processes around fixed terms. Renewals have acted as natural checkpoints for rent reviews, landlord conversations, document updates, property condition checks, and risk assessment. Once tenancies become periodic by default, those built-in milestones start to disappear.

So the challenge is not simply understanding the law. It is rebuilding agency operations so important actions still happen, just without the crutch of a renewal date.

**Why this creates a headache for letting agents**

The biggest problem with periodic tenancies is not that they are unmanageable. It is that they are easier to manage badly.

In a medium-sized agency, nobody usually notices the cracks at first. A property manager thinks a negotiator has dealt with a rent review. A negotiator assumes the landlord has already been briefed on the new notice position. Compliance documents are technically stored somewhere, but not necessarily where the right person can find them quickly. Maintenance issues get resolved, but the timeline is hard to reconstruct later if a complaint lands.

Under a more flexible tenancy model, those gaps matter more. Without fixed-term renewal dates, agencies lose a lot of the natural prompts that used to drive action. That can create several operational risks at once:

* rent reviews happen too late, or not at all

* landlord expectations are not reset early enough

* inspections become inconsistent

* communications are harder to track

* teams rely more heavily on individual memory rather than shared process

None of that is dramatic on day one. But over a portfolio of 300, 800 or 1,500 units, it becomes expensive very quickly.

The agencies that will cope best are the ones that stop thinking in “tenancy events”. This is the real mindset shift. In the old model, agencies often worked around major events: move-in, renewal, arrears, notice, move-out. In the new model, stronger agencies will think in cycles instead:

* onboarding cycle

* rent review cycle

* inspection cycle

* compliance cycle

* maintenance cycle

* risk review cycle

* landlord reporting cycle

That sounds subtle, but it changes everything.Instead of waiting for a renewal to trigger a conversation, you create a rent review workflow that exists independently. Instead of relying on tenancy anniversaries to revisit risk, you run recurring portfolio reviews. Instead of assuming documents will be checked when a tenancy is re-signed, you make document visibility and reminders part of BAU operations.

That is how periodic becomes manageable.

**What medium-sized agencies should rebuild first**

The best place to start is with the pressure points that used to sit around renewals.

1. Rent review workflows

If the tenancy no longer renews in a fixed-term sense, you need a clear internal process for identifying which rents are under market, when to serve notice, how to evidence the proposed increase, and how to communicate it without creating unnecessary friction.

2. Landlord communication

A lot of landlord anxiety is really just uncertainty in a blazer. They are not always panicking about the law itself. They are panicking because they think flexibility means loss of control. Agents who explain the new structure clearly and proactively will keep more trust.

3. Inspection and maintenance visibility

If the legal environment is moving toward stronger tenant protections and better property standards, reactive property management becomes a weaker strategy. Agencies need better oversight of open issues, response times and repair history.

4. Record-keeping

Periodic tenancies make timelines matter more, not less. If a dispute emerges over communication, notice, repairs, rent increases or behaviour, the agency needs a clean chronology.

This is also a commercial opportunity Not every agency will enjoy hearing that. But it is true.

A lot of self-managing landlords are about to discover that “rolling tenancy” does not mean “hands-off tenancy”. In practice, a more rights-aware rental environment raises the value of competent management. The agencies that can show they have structured processes, documented communication, reliable compliance habits and clean reporting are in a stronger position to win instructions. That is the upside side of this reform.

The weaker story is: “Everything is changing and it’s a nightmare.”

The stronger story is: “The market is becoming more operationally demanding, and good agents are now worth more.”

**What practical readiness looks like**

A ready agency is not one that has memorised every headline. It is one that can answer these questions quickly:

* Which tenancies need landlord comms before 1 May 2026?

* Which properties are likely to need a rent review this quarter?

* Where are maintenance histories stored?

* Can we evidence what was sent, when, and to whom?

* Are compliance certificates and tenancy documents easy to locate?

* Can branch leaders see portfolio-level risk without chasing staff for updates?

*

If those answers currently live across inboxes, spreadsheets and people’s heads, the new regime will feel harder than it needs to.

togetha helps by bringing tenancy records, compliance documents, rent collection, maintenance tracking and communication history into one place, which makes periodic-tenancy management much less reliant on memory and much more process-led. That matters most for agencies that have grown past the point where “we’ll just keep an eye on it” is a serious operating model.

**So what now?** 

Periodic by default does not remove structure from agency work. It removes old structure.

The agencies that replace it with better internal systems will not just stay compliant. They will look calmer, sharper and more valuable to landlords who are nervous about what comes next.

Want to see how togetha helps letting agents manage tenancies, documents, maintenance and compliance in one place? Book a demo today.